Solanum sarrachoides
2n=2x=24 (Edmonds 1972, 1977; Bukenya 1996; Moyetta et al. 2013; Olet et al. 2015).
Solanum sarrachoides is native to southern South America, but has been introduced globally as an agricultural weed. It grows in urban areas, along riversides, and other disturbed areas; between 0 - 2,300 m elevation in its native range, between 0 - 800 (1,400) m in the introduced range.
Old World: South Africa: umrobe wezinja; Sweden: Klibbnattskatta (Mossberg et al. 2003); United Kingdom: leafy-fruited nightshade (Stace 2010).
Preliminary conservation status (IUCN 2016). Solanum sarrachoides is not a weedy species and has not spread far despite various introductions across the world; in its native range it is widespread (EOO 2,089,288 km2) and can be assigned a preliminary status of LC (Least Concern; Table 7 in Sarkinen et al. 2018).
Solanum sarrachoides is morphologically similar to S. nitidibaccatum. The two taxa can be distinguished based on generally truncate leaf bases, leaf-opposed inflorescences that are umbellate to sub-umbellate with fewer flowers (2-5, rarely 6-7), shorter calyx lobes 1.5-2.0 mm long, and a corolla with yellow-green central eye in S. sarrachoides, compared to S. nitidibaccatum which has attenuate to cuneate leaf bases, internodal inflorescences that are racemose with more flowers (4-8, occasionally up to 9-10), longer calyx lobes 1.7-2.5 mm long, and a corolla with yellow-green central eye with black-purple V- or U-shaped margins. The buds of S. sarrachoides are included in the calyx until just before anthesis and the berries are usually matte instead of shiny as they are in S. nitidibaccatum.
Solanum sarrachoides is a diploid species native to north-eastern and central Argentina, Paraguay and southernmost Brazil. The introduction of the species to Europe and North America is largely due to trade with South America and the importation of seeds and grain together with the practice of spreading wool waste (‘shoddy’) as manure, and based on herbarium records seems to have been introduced some time at the beginning of the 20th century. Despite its introduction in the early 1900s, the species remains relatively uncommon in both Europe and North America, with sporadic records from elsewhere, including South Africa (e.g., Eastern Cape, Phillipson & Hobson 5256). Solanum sarrachoides has not spread to Australasia; all literature records (e.g., Healy 1974; Henderson 1974; Ogg et al. 1981; Schilling 1981; Symon 1981) suggest that material from Australasia refers to material we recognise as S. nitidibaccatum.
Within the Old World, S. sarrachoides has often been confused with S. nitidibaccatum and records of S. sarrachoides or S. nitidibaccatum in the literature should be taken with caution due to common misidentification of voucher material. Many regional treatments do not separate between these morphologically very similar species (e.g., Stebbins and Paddock 1949).
Edmonds (1986) provides a discussion of the complex synonymy and lectotypification of S. sarrachoides. The species epithet is often seen spelled as “sarachoides”, because Sendtner was thought to have named this species after the genus Saracha Ruiz & Pav. (after the taxa now part of the genus Jaltomata Schltdl.), but in Flora Brasiliensis (Sendtner 1846) he used both “Saracha” and “Sarracha”, and Edmonds (1986) determined that the name is correctly spelled S. sarrachoides following the original publication.