Solanum campechiense
Southernmost Texas, both coasts of Mexico, Guatemala to Costa Rica; Greater Antilles; Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, often along muddy edges of ephemeral lakes and streams in tropical dry forest, 0-100 (-900) m in elevation. There are several records from coastal Brazil, but they remain suspect: Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: "data probably doubtful" in handwriting of C. V. Morton and printed label with "Plantae Brasiliae et Indiae occidentales" with the latter crossed out, 4 Dec (fl), Carvalho s.n. (GH). Rio Grande do Sul: Porto Alegre, in ruderalis prope Alfandega, Apr 1897 (fl), E. M. Reineck s.n. (E). The Reineck collection would seem to be a solid record, but there are also specimens of S. persicifolium Dunal collected at Porto Alegre, ad margines viarum prope Arraial da Gloria, Nov 1898 (fl,fr), E. M. Reineck s.n. (E) and cidade da Bahia, ad margines prope Alfandega, Oct 1899 (fl,fr), E. M. Reineck s.n. (E), so that either Reineck was recording stray waifs of these West Indian species at Brazilian port towns, or the labels are incorrect.
Solanum campechiense belongs to the Leptostemonum clade of Solanum (Bohs, 2005, Levin et al., in press), which corresponds for the most part to Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum (Dunal) Bitter. This group includes species that have prickles and stellate hairs. Molecular data do not resolve the relationships of S. campechiense within the Leptostemonum clade (Levin et al., in press). The calyx with acicular prickles, growth form and leaf lobing are reminiscent of S. sisymbriifolium Lam., and it was placed with this and two other species in subgenus Leptostemonum section Melongena subsect. Cryptocarpum (Dunal) G. Don by Nee (1999). The curved anthers and ridged seeds also indicate a possible relationship to sect. Androceras, a section centered in Mexico.
Gentry, J.L., Jr., & P.C. Standley 1974. Solanaceae.
In Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana: Botany 24, Part X, Numbers 1 and 2: 1-151.
Knapp, S. & C.E. Jarvis 1990. The typification of the names of New World Solanum species described by Linnaeus.
J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 104: 325-367.
Nee, M. 1993. Solanaceae II.
Flora de Veracruz 72: 1-158. Instituto de Ecología, Xalapa, Veracruz.
Nee, M. 1999. Synopsis of Solanum in the New World.
Pp. 285–333 in M. Nee, D. E. Symon, R. N. Lester & J. P. Jessop (eds.), Solanaceae IV: Advances in Biology and Utilization. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
Bohs, L. 2005. Major clades in Solanum based on ndhF sequences.
Pp. 27-49 in R. C. Keating, V. C. Hollowell, & T. B. Croat (eds.), A festschrift for William G. D’Arcy: the legacy of a taxonomist. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 104. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.
Levin, R.A., N.R. Myers, & L. Bohs 2006. Phylogenetic relationships among the "spiny" solanums (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum).
Amer. J. Bot. 93: 157-169.
Nuclear ITS sequence: GenBank AF244728 (voucher: Bohs 2536, UT). (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&val=7533148) Nuclear waxy sequence: GenBank AY996389 (voucher: Bohs 2536, UT). Chloroplast trnS-trnG sequence: GenBank AY998388 (voucher: Bohs 2536, UT). Chloroplast ndhF sequence: GenBank AF224071 (voucher: Bohs 2536, UT) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&val=7025415)
Solanum campechiense can be distinguished from other New World spiny Solanum species by its small stature, abundant straight prickles, and deeply lobed leaves with serrate margins. The fruits apparently turn purplish when ripe. In Chiapas, the label of López & Hernández s.n. (MEXU) says that “Se comen la fruta los peces cuando sube el nivel de agua”. The seeds differ from the usual yellow and slightly foveolate; the surface cells seem inflated and probably serve for flotation of a species often found on mud flats or edges of drying ponds. Specimens have been seen which begin flowering when the plants are only 2 cm tall.
Plants of S. campechiense from Costa Rica may have flowers with smaller anthers than specimens from Mexico and Guatemala, based on the measurements in Nee (1993) and Gentry and Standley (1974), but this remains to be documented by examining herbarium specimens from these areas.